What did you dream of becoming when you were a child?
And how close have you come to achieving that dream?

If your answer is “nowhere near” you’re not alone! In fact, only one in ten Americans say they are working their ‘dream job’.

This reality gives rise to frequent “if only…” moments for employees. “If only I’d stuck with that course.” “If only I’d studied for a different degree.” “If only I’d chosen that career path instead of this one.” The list goes on.

Research has found that a whopping 94% of employees regularly think about these alternate paths, with only 6% claiming they never or almost never entertain these thoughts. Indeed 21% of workers reported that they have these “if only” thoughts “often” or “almost always”!

And this is having a direct impact on business performance, as these employees tend to be more distracted, daydream more frequently, take breaks and days off more often, are less engaged, and are more likely to be searching for other jobs.

In today’s world, it’s easy to fall victim to this spiral of thoughts due to the multitude of choices we constantly face. LinkedIn’s Easy Apply option, for example, makes speculative applications for a new role simple and undemanding.

This may be a great way for an individual to scratch their “if only” itch, but it has driven a surge in the ‘apply anyway’ trend, with a 2023 report finding 73% of recruiters reporting a lack of qualified applicants for roles as the biggest challenge in the hiring process.

Given all of the above, it crucial for employers to address and redirect these “if only” thoughts into creative and innovative outputs. Here are some strategies to consider:

  • Recognition: Acknowledging employee contributions is essential for boosting engagement. Quantum Workplace conducted research which discovered that when employees believe management will recognize their efforts, they are 2.7 times more likely to be highly engaged.  By regularly reminding employees of their value to the company and demonstrating how their work directly contributes to the business’s success, employers can reaffirm that their job matters and the choices leading them there were meaningful.
  • Role Flexibility: Creating opportunities for ‘job crafting’ is an effective way to diminish “if only” feelings. Allowing employees to innovate within their roles and incorporate personal passions fosters fulfillment. Managers should strive to understand their employees’ talents and interests, finding creative ways to integrate these elements into their work. This approach helps align an employee’s identity with their job, reigniting their engagement and commitment.
  • Internal Locus of Control: In psychology, individuals with a high internal locus of control  believe they have significant control over their behavior and view outcomes as a result of their actions rather than external factors. Coaching employees to develop this mindset can help them respond productively to “if only” thinking. When employees feel empowered and responsible for their successes, they are less likely to be distracted by past choices and more focused on their current roles.

It’s natural for employees to occasionally wonder about alternate career paths. While harmless reflection can be beneficial, those who find themselves stuck in the past may need support to move forward. HR practitioners play a vital role in guiding employees through these thoughts and helping them find purpose and engagement in their current roles.

If you would like to discuss how we can help improve your employee engagement levels by optimizing the wonderment of “if only”, please get in touch with us.

Together, we can transform these reflections into productive and fulfilling experiences for your workforce.

OK, so what do you think the office is really for?

What was once seen as a logical and efficient way of working has now been brought into question by the “work-from-home” / “return-to-office” tug-of-war which has broken out between employees and business leaders in many organizations.

So, to work out where we’re going – we first need to rewind.

From the 15th-century scriptoriums of medieval monks to the modern skyscrapers dotting urban landscapes, the ‘office’ has always been in a shifting state with innovations like artificial light, telephones, typewriters, elevators, and computers progressively reshaping the working environment.

Then came the lockdown. An abrupt shift that turned traditional office dynamics upside down. Those able to work from home found their productivity and job satisfaction often increased. Today, nine in ten jobseekers say hybrid work is now as important as financial benefits.

This shift challenges employers to rethink how office spaces can boost productivity while supporting employee well-being in remote settings. The strategy for this transformation focuses on policy, place, and purposeful leadership:

  • Policy: Clear and well-communicated hybrid and remote work policies are essential. Define when employees need to be in the office and when they have the flexibility to choose. Transparency in policy-making fosters trust and loyalty.
  • Place: Office space must cater to diverse needs. Some employees may need a quiet workspace every day, while others might prefer the office for collaborative tasks only once a week. Whether it’s a Superdesk for collaboration or cubicles for concentration, the office should accommodate various working styles.
    But beware! There is no ‘best way’ to do it – a recent study found that actively trying to make creative office spaces could be stifling creativity, whilst another discovered that changing from cubicles to open-plan saw a 70% drop in face-to-face interactions!
  • Purposeful Leaders: Leaders play a crucial role in implementing these policies and ensuring the office space delivers value. Effective leaders highlight the benefits of coming to the office, promoting collaboration, and enhancing company culture. This can transform the office from a chore to a place employees are excited to be.

Employers must recognize the benefits of hybrid and remote work, leveraging these models to optimize productivity rather than viewing them as obstacles. The purpose of the office is evolving, and it’s time to lead this change.

We are here to help you navigate this transformation, optimizing organizational effectiveness in hybrid work, crafting policies, and coaching leaders to meet your company’s unique needs and those of your workforce. So, to continue this conversation, you can either head over to our contact page, or reach out to me directly at andy@orgshakers.com

The New Year is always a time for reflection, and more often than not, this can lead to us reevaluating what things have been bringing us purpose in our life and where in our lives this purpose can be found. This is where The Purpose Effect: Building Meaning in Yourself, Your Role and Your Organization by Dan Pontefract comes into play.

Dan is a leadership and culture change strategist, a keynote speaker with over two decades of experience at companies such as SAP, TELUS, and Business Objects, and an author to a number of bestselling books.

In his book The Purpose Effect, Dan combines his years of experience with swathes of research on employee engagement to create a work about the three crucial areas of purpose that result in the Purpose Effect: individual, workplace role, and organizational. 

Purpose-driven organizations focus on more than just profits. They align personal, organizational, and role-based purposes, benefiting both employees and society. When these elements align, employees feel fulfilled and engaged, contributing towards better work. If there is a mismatch between an employee’s personal purpose and the organization’s goals, it can ultimately lead to dissatisfaction.

This is where the Purpose Effect comes in, and it arises from three main factors:

  1. Personal Sense of Purpose: Employees need to have a motivating purpose. This involves growth, defining life goals, and maintaining ethical behavior. Employees should be continually asking themselves how they are evolving and how they want to be perceived at work.
  2. Organizational Purpose: This defines why the company exists. It reflects the company’s principles, ethics, culture, and commitment to fair practices. Fair compensation, performance management, and recognition are essential for aligning employees with a company’s purpose.
  3. Role-Based Purpose: Each employee’s role must align with their personal and organizational purpose. When employees see their work as a ‘calling’, they are more likely to engage with said work.

Dan’s book teaches employers how they can find what he dubs the ‘sweet spot’ – this is the intersection of personal, organizational, and role purposes. By achieving this alignment, leaders will be able to foster a community spirit within the organization that will lead to a more productive, motivated workforce, as a company without a clear purpose may struggle to attract and retain top talent.

If you would like to discuss how we can help implement the best strategies to achieve the Purpose Effect, please get in touch with us today!

In the meantime, be sure to grab a copy of The Purpose Effect – you can head over here for the US and here for the UK.

Last year, we asked the OrgShakers team what practices and ideologies they thought employers should be leaving behind as they ventured into the New Year.

Now, as another year comes to a close, we wanted to see what they believe should be left behind in 2024 in order to help propel sustainability and growth in the year to come:

  • Our Founder David Fairhurst believes that the end of the year is a great time for HR leaders to be considering their key areas of focus for 2025, and this includes looking at what practices should be left behind in order to foster more innovative, inclusive, and employee-centric workplaces. This could be done by adopting outcome-centered models of managing performance, or placing a greater focus on strategic workforce planning to ensure the workforce is a future fit, or even looking into comprehensive wellbeing strategies to avoid employee burnout, to name a few. But what’s important to remember when looking at new practices is to be realistic, and this can be done by thinking of HR strategic objectives on three levels:
    • What are the basics that need to be maintained?
    • What are the areas that must continuously improve?
    • What are the big moves we need to focus on which will offer a transformative impact?
  • Anya Clitheroe would like to stop hearing managers complaining about the Gen Z workforce! This year she has heard so many managers making the blanket statement that Gen Z have been spoilt and they don’t want to work hard or that they don’t show any initiative. Instead, Anya would like them to find a way to engage the younger workforce in a way that interests them. Have they clearly communicated ways of working expectations, and have they found out what does motivate them? At the very least, they need to see that not every Gen Z can be identical in their workstyle preferences!
  • Speaking of leaders, Marty Belle believes that employers should leave behind rigidity and paternalistic leadership operating styles. These areas of inflexibility include enforcing Return to Work practices in cases where remote workers are more productive, or only offering fixed work schedules without taking into consideration some workers may not be morning people and would choose to work mid-day rather than early morning. Additionally, more flexible scheduling would accommodate childcare needs and parental involvement in their children’s extracurricular activities.
  • Building on this, Lauren Kincaid believes that employers should be leaving behind a one-size-fits all approach when it comes to employment policies and employee benefits. The more personalized the employment experience, the more seen, heard and valued an employee feels, resulting in better employee engagement, loyalty and performance.
  • Echoing Marty’s sentiment of rigidity, Sayid Hussein also believes employers should leave behind in 2024 a “9-to-5, in-office only” mentality. With advancements in technology and changing workforce dynamics, it’s time to embrace flexible working arrangements that prioritize outcomes over hours. Trusting employees to manage their time fosters creativity, improves retention, and acknowledges the diverse realities of modern life.
  • Speaking of mindsets, Karen Cerrato believes that employers should be leaving behind short-term thinking. Whether at a corporate level or a management level, if we want longevity out of our employees, Kanen believes that need to start thinking strategically and long term. The days of people staying in a job for 10 yrs + “just because”, are long gone; we need to give them a reason to want to stay:  
    • Reactive decision-making: Shift toward proactive strategies that prioritize long-term growth and stability.
    • Underinvestment in talent: Invest in professional development and career growth opportunities for employees.
    • Top-down communication only: Foster two-way communication to engage employees and encourage innovation.
  • Amanda Holland believes that employers need to be conducting their final Covid pandemic clean up: it’s time to finish assessing any processes or procedures developed specifically during the pandemic. Operationalize any efficiencies your company will be keeping by ensuring the language is up-to-date and free from pandemic references. Eliminate those policies, processes, and procedures that are no longer needed or applicable.
  • Ken Merritt believes that employers should be leaving behind ‘reluctance’. Several companies have been slow to hire and fast to retire because there has been a ‘cloud of reluctance’ hanging over the economy since 2022 – it’s time for employers to be leaving that behind for good in 2024.
  • Therese Procter knows that 2024 has been a very challenging year, with the key topics of remote working, political uncertainty, and the skills gap taking many of the highlight spots. But an area that she believes is often pushed down the agenda (whether this be due to the amount of effort and/or cost it requires) is mental and financial wellbeing. That’s why she believes that employers should be leaving behind poor and ineffective mental health support strategies and programs that are outdated and not fit for purpose, and instead take on a fresh approach to wellbeing this new year that better supports mental and financial aspects of life.

If you would like to get in touch with us about any of the points raised by our team, or if you have a different concerns that you were hoping to leave in 2024 and need assistance in shedding it, please don’t hesitate to get in touch with us today!

Equally, if you want some on-demand advice and strategies, why not book in a 1-hour private consultation with one of our seasoned HR professionals? Take a look at our OrgShakers CL!CK service for more details!

From all of us at OrgShakers, we wish you a happy and prosperous New Year!

Chinese company Pang Dong Lai made history this year by introducing a new form of paid time off: Unhappiness Leave’.

The 7,000 employees at this chain of shopping malls and grocery stores can now request an additional 10-days of paid time off if they are ‘not feeling happy’ … leave which cannot be overruled by line managers!

This has been introduced to highlight their focus on physical and mental wellbeing, as founder and chairman of the company, Yu Donglai, believes that employees should be entitled to a healthy and relaxed life when working for his company.

So, should companies around the world be considering introducing their own form of Unhappiness Leave?

We know that happier employees are around 13% more productive, and so understanding what you, as an employer, can be doing to foster happiness in your workplace is imperative when it comes to driving the productivity of your workforce.

However, a recent study found that 65% of workers do not use their full annual leave allowance. But much like Unhappiness Leave implies, a key element of fostering happiness is recognizing the importance of time away from the workplace.

Time off from work should not be viewed as an optional thing; employers should be actively encouraging their staff to make use of their annual leave, as it results in a myriad of physical and mental benefits that actually lead to better work and higher engagement overall:

  • Benefits for the Mind – when a person is overwhelmed with work, the cognitive impact this can have can result in mental fatigue, difficulty concentrating, forgetfulness, and impaired problem-solving abilities. Therefore, taking time away from work provides a greater opportunity for rest, relaxation, and better sleep, which can help to unclutter the mind and create more mental space, reducing the likelihood of overwhelm.
  • Benefits for the Body – work pressures can see a spike in the stress hormone cortisol, which is a similar feeling that one would feel when in danger. Because the body is unable to distinguish the difference, an increase in the stress hormone actually results in the suppression of the immune system to allow the body to channel its energy to fight or flee from the non-existent danger that it thinks is present. Making time to relax on vacation can help to reduce these levels of stress hormones, allowing the immune system to recover, overall reducing the chances of getting sick.
  • Benefits for the Soul – it can seem a bit silly, but taking time to reconnect with oneself can be another great benefit of taking time away from work. We frequently refer to this mental ‘happy place’, and taking time off work can create the space for employees to internally reflect about what it is that truly does bring them joy and nourish their soul.

There are many more ingredients to the recipe for a happy employee, but taking that time for yourself to rest, relax, and rejuvenate is up there as one of the most important. Employers should therefore consider following in the footsteps of Yu Donglai when it comes to his commitment to fostering happiness at work … and maybe it’s worth considering if Unhappiness Leave is something that would benefit your workforce, too.

In the post pandemic era of flexible and remote working, global mobility is no longer just about relocating employees – it’s about driving organizational growth, fostering innovation, and building resilient, future-ready workforces.

Global mobility has evolved from being primarily a logistical function into a cornerstone of talent strategy, where mobility data analytics can be used to forecast talent needs, aligning mobility with business objectives, and ensuring that policies promote inclusivity and equity.

  1. Access to Global Talent Pools
    The war for talent has expanded beyond borders. Global mobility programs enable organizations to tap into the widest possible pool of talent, ensuring individuals with the right skills and experience are in the right locations. This not only addresses local talent shortages but also enhances diversity, which has been proven to drive innovation and performance.
  2. Leadership Development and Succession Planning
    International experience is a critical component of developing leaders who understand global markets and cultural nuances. By embedding mobility into leadership development programs, firms can ensure they are equipping executives with the skills required to successfully lead a diverse and interconnected workforce.
  3. Enhancing Employee Experience and Retention
    Offering opportunities for global assignments is a compelling employee value proposition. It demonstrates an investment in professional growth and fosters a sense of adventure and purpose, which are critical for retaining the next generation of top talent in a competitive labor market.
  4. Building Organizational Agility
    Global mobility enhances an organization’s ability to respond to market changes and new opportunities. Whether it’s establishing operations in emerging markets or quickly deploying talent for critical projects, mobility programs underpin agility and scalability.

Challenges and Opportunities

Global mobility inevitably creates challenges and requires the navigation of complex employer compliance obligations including tax, immigration, and local labour laws, not to mention the high costs which can be associated with employee relocations.

However, with the right policies, partners, and tech-enabled support it is possible to overcome these challenges without compromising the employee experience.

In today’s interconnected world, global mobility is not just an operational necessity – it’s a strategic enabler. And by leveraging mobility as a driver of innovation, agility, diversity, and talent development, business leaders can position their organizations to thrive on the international stage.

If you would like to discuss how we can support global talent mobility in your organization, please get in touch with us today.

This month, we have grabbed ourselves a copy of Joe Mull’s latest book, Employalty: How to Ignite Commitment and Keep Top Talent in the New Age of Work. With retention being a pressing issue that many employers find themselves grappling with in the modern working world, Employalty acts as an essential guide for any leader who wants to ensure they are retaining their top talent for the long run.

Joe Mull, a dynamic, captivating speaker and leadership expert, introduces the reader to the concept of ‘employalty’, which is centred around the idea that winning the new war for talent requires a more humane employee experience.

In his book, Joe argues that there are three key factors of employalty. The commitment that organizations seek from their teams will come from those who can do their ideal job and do meaningful work for a great boss.

  • Ideal Job – this is what the employee gets in exchange for their work. Do the financials, schedule and workload fit into their life in an ideal way? With the rise of the carpe diem mindset post-COVID, employees now have a new value for their time, and so when a job can fit into the responsibilities in their personal lives and accommodate for these well, this will see employee loyalty gain significant traction.
  • Meaningful Work – it’s not a leap to say that when employees feel like what they are doing has meaning and purpose, and adds value to the company, then this in turn fosters loyalty. Employees who are aligned with the mission of a company, and who are made to feel their individual contributions to that mission are noticed and valued, will want to stay with that company for the long run.
  • Great Boss – a leader or direct report have so much sway over whether an employee chooses to remain at a company or not. Recently, a LinkedIn survey discovered that nearly seven in ten employees said they would quit their job over a bad manager – but on the flip side, the main reason why a lot of employees choose to stay is due to having a great boss. After all, if an employee is having a consistently psychologically safe and fulfilling experience, they will want to continue working in that environment for the foreseeable future.

Grounded in research and filled to the brim with captivating stories, Joe’s Employalty provides the reader with a to-the-point, evidenced-based framework for creating the kind of employee experience that results in people joining a company, staying long term, and doing great work.

If you would like to discuss how we can help bring some of Joe’s employalty strategies to life, please get in touch with us today.

And in the meantime, make sure you grab a copy of Employalty – you can purchase it here in the US and here in the UK.

Companies that actively support and collaborate with charities are not only contributing positively to the wider community – they are also making a smart business move.

Research has found that those businesses that donate over 0.5% of turnover are twice as likely to experience enhancements in company reputation and are nearly 50% more likely to find it beneficial for recruiting and retaining staff.

Moreover, charity work fosters collaboration and cohesion among employees, breaking down social barriers by providing non-work-related topics for bonding.

Adopting a corporate social responsibility mindset enriches the ‘Social’ component of your ESG agenda and can also support Environmental strategies depending on the charities chosen.

To reap these benefits, employers must effectively engage their teams with the chosen cause.

How can employers achieve this?

Firstly, involve employees in choosing the charities to support. When the supported cause aligns with the company’s mission and values, as well as those of the team, it fosters immediate excitement and engagement. This could include supporting a charity for a cause that has personally impacted staff members. Identifying the mission is the first step, and encouraging employee involvement boosts enthusiasm.

Highlighting charity as a core value during recruitment and onboarding is also effective. This can include offering a set number of volunteer days in benefit packages, allowing employees to volunteer while still being compensated. Involvement in charitable projects during the initial weeks of onboarding can also serve as an icebreaker and assimilation tool.

And, importantly, find ways to make it enjoyable! Collaborate with charities to understand their fundraising methods, such as Race For Life or fun challenges like growing a mustache for Movember.  Whatever the cause – and whatever employees are doing – make an effort to sponsor some (or all!) of your team to take part to actively engage everyone and provide a change from the workplace.

Successfully engaging teams in fundraising and volunteer work provides access to numerous business benefits while contributing positively to society.

If you would like to discuss how we can support your engagement with charities and philanthropy, please get in touch with us today.

For new employees, the elation of coming to the end of the hiring process and being offered a job can be such a rewarding feeling. Out of all the candidates that applied, they were the one who made it to the finish line.

However, this elation can quickly fizzle out if they come to discover that they were not the first-choice candidate. It’s not uncommon for employers to offer a job to their top candidate only for that candidate to decline, and so naturally they will present the offer to the next best candidate.

While this is a common occurrence, it can be tricky for employers if this new hire discovers they were not the initial pick. This notion is proven by a recent study conducted by Harvard Business Review, which discovered that those employees who knew or believed they were an alternate choice were less socially integrated and less likely to seek feedback than their peers.

In other words, this knowledge can have a real effect on morale, confidence, and overall job satisfaction for the new employee, as well as open up the door for imposter syndrome to creep in.

So, when this situation arises, how should employers handle this to ensure the relationship with the new hire remains positive and productivity remains unaffected?

1. Acknowledge the Situation with Transparency

Honesty and transparency are the foundation of a good working relationship. If a new hire confronts the fact that they weren’t the first choice, the worst thing an employer can do is deny or downplay the situation. Instead, acknowledge it openly, but add a positive spin to it – “we had a number of strong candidates, and it was a difficult decision. However, we’re confident that you bring the right skills, experience, and attitude to succeed in this role“. The key thing here is to focus on the value the new hire brings to the team, which should hopefully mitigate any potential hurt feelings.

2. Reaffirm the Candidate’s Strengths and Value

When someone discovers they were the second choice, it’s natural for them to feel a bit insecure, so reaffirming their strengths is a crucial step in managing this reaction. Ensure to reiterate the reasons they were chosen and emphasize the qualities that set them apart. By highlighting their unique contributions, you reinforce their confidence and show that they weren’t just a fallback option but a candidate with real potential.

3. Focus on the Future, Not the Past

Once the issue has been addressed, it’s important to shift the focus from the hiring process to the future. After all, what matters most is how the new hire performs in their role, not the order which they were selected in. This forward-looking approach helps the employee move past the “second choice” label and concentrate on their own success.

4. Create a Supportive Work Environment

Once the conversation is over, employers should ensure that the new hire feels welcomed and supported in their role. A positive onboarding experience, continuous feedback, and professional development opportunities can all help boost the new hire’s confidence and solidify their commitment to the company. In addition, regular check-ins during the onboarding process can provide the new hire with a platform to voice concerns and give them an opportunity to receive constructive feedback – which as highlighted by Harvard’s study above, can be a real issue!

5. Don’t Let the “Second Choice” Label Stick

One of the most important things to keep in mind is that the “second choice” label should not define the employee’s experience. Managers must ensure that this detail doesn’t follow the employee throughout their time at the company, as at the end of the day, the candidate who was ultimately selected for the job is the best fit for the organization, regardless of the hiring order.

Discovering that you were the second choice in the hiring process can be a delicate moment for any new employee. However, how employers respond to this situation can make all the difference in preserving, and even strengthening, the relationship with the new hire.

By handling the situation with transparency, focusing on the new hire’s strengths, and creating a supportive work environment, employers can turn a potentially negative discovery into a positive and affirming experience.

If you would like to discuss the training we offer around creating an inclusive working environment, please get in touch with us today.

You can do a lot in sixty minutes.

In 1903, Orville and Wilbur Wright marked the dawn of aviation with FOUR successful powered flights in the space of just one hour!

In 2020 Mo Farah set a world record by running 21,330 meters in 60 minutes. That’s an average speed of over 13 mph, which is faster than most of us can run if we sprint just 100 meters. He just maintained that pace for a whole hour – try that on your next fun run!

Alternatively, you could make yourself a delicious meal of Beef Tacos with Homemade Guacamole. Our favorite recipe takes about an hour from ‘fridge to fork’.

What we see here is that while sixty minutes might not seem that long – the length of a team meeting, a workout at the gym, or an episode of your favorite podcast – it can also be incredibly productive and even transformative.

At OrgShakers, we believe in The Power of the Hour … 60-minutes where leaders can bounce around ideas, receive expert advice, or get the objective feedback they need to start something incredible. After all, every successful business we’ve come to know started with an idea – and someone who was willing to listen.

That’s why we’re excited to introduce our new consulting service: OrgShakers CL!CK.

OrgShakers CL!CK offers a one-hour, private and confidential online consultation with one of our experienced HR professionals. It’s perfect for those moments when you need advice to tackle a new challenge, to test and refine your HR strategy, or simply to try out new ideas to see what resonates.

With extensive global corporate experience, our team is equipped to provide guidance on any HR-related question, whether you’re dealing with everyday tactical issues or complex strategic concerns.

If you would like to learn more about this service and book in time with one of our team members, head over to https://orgshakers.com/orgshakers-click/

Reid Hoffman, co-founder of popular social media platform LinkedIn, recently made the prediction that by 2034, the 9-to-5 job will be extinct.

Hoffman is famed for his grand predictions; most notably, he predicted the mass rise of social media back in 1997 – something which has definitely come to fruition. Now, as we see the world of work continuously change and evolve as it keeps in pace with new generations of workers, new technological advancements, and the rise of the 4-day work week, it’s not such a jump to consider that Henry Ford’s 9-to-5 model – which came into practice in the early 1900s – might be on its way out.

To get a better idea, we asked the OrgShakers team whether they think Reid Hoffman’s prediction is accurate, and if so, what they believe the 9-to-5 will be replaced with:

  • David Fairhurst – I agree with Hoffman’s prediction of the 9-to-5 becoming extinct, as it lines up perfectly with my own predicted that HR professionals and businesses need to be preparing for the end of jobs altogether. The ‘job’ – defined as a set of responsibilities assigned to an individual employee – has been the fundamental building block of organizations for millennia.

However, we have seen that the pace of this organizational change has been rapidly accelerated by the influx of new technologies paired with the evaporation of the boundaries of time and geography. Therefore, I believe that a more flexible and responsive methodology is needed in order to keep up with this new pace of change through companies increasingly adopting a skills-based approach to managing work and workers. 

  • Therese Procter – With the rise of the gig economy, remote work, and automation, more people are going to choose to work on their own terms, selecting projects and clients that align with their skills and interests. AI and automation will likely free humans from mundane and repetitive tasks, paving the way for more creative and high-value work. This shift could lead to a fundamental change in how we approach work, possibly making the traditional 9-to-5 schedule redundant. So, I agree with the prediction, however, it’s essential to note that this prediction might not apply universally. Certain industries, such as healthcare, education, and retail, will still require more traditional schedules.

As we move forward, it’s crucial for individuals, companies, and governments to adapt to these changes and create new systems that support this evolving workforce. This might involve rethinking education, training, and social safety nets to ensure that everyone can thrive in this new environment.

  • Clare Parkes –  I don’t know that 9-5 will be extinct per se, but I do agree that there will be a more significant mix in the workplace of different employment terms. Given, amongst many trends, the shift towards skill-based job design, greater flexibility post-Covid, and a need to refine the non-office-based teams’ terms and conditions towards the increasing consumer demand of 24/7, then it is inevitable that the way we employ people will change, with an increased mix of employment agreements and ways of working as a result.
  • Ken Merrit – I agree with the thesis that the 9 to 5 workday will be extinct in the next 20 years. The following 2 trends are driving us to this inevitable outcome:
  • Changing of the Guard:  As Boomers & Gen X descend and Millennials & Gen Z ascend as business leaders, traditional business model operating rules will change accordingly. I believe that means we will have more open work rules and far fewer rigid structures that were born prior to today’s workforce engagement preferences and the digital age.
    • Future of Virtual Work: More technology and broader geographies have already ushered in more virtual work through Zoom, Teams, etc.  Businesses, Education, and Not-for-Profit models are all getting more comfortable with working across time zones and timelines. As tools like Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality become more adopted, it will enable even more flexibility for the future of work.
  • Cindy Strong – According to Reid Hoffman the traditional 9-5 will become a thing of the past, claiming AI and the gig economy will continue to be disruptors and change agents in the way work is done. Although the key contributors he outlines are already being felt by the modern workforce, I don’t agree it is likely all traditional ways of working will be extinct. Rather we will require new skills to adapt to the advances in technology and flexibility in the way work is done. It is not a new experience for technology, inventions and world events to be a catalyst to require a workforce to be resilient to change. The encouragement is we have insights from leaders like Mr. Hoffman to prepare our resilience on the horizon of uncertainty.
  • Sayid Hussein – I agree with Reid Hoffman’s prediction that the traditional 9-to-5 job could be extinct by 2034. The rise of remote work, flexible schedules, and the gig economy have already begun to shift the workforce away from rigid time structures. In place of the 9-to-5, I believe we will see a more fluid work environment where individuals manage their own hours, driven by project-based work or outcomes rather than clocking in and out at specific times. This change will be fuelled by advances in technology, such as AI and automation, which will enable people to work from anywhere at any time, making the concept of a fixed workday increasingly obsolete.
  • Anju Jain – I agree with Reid Hoffman’s prediction that the 9-to-5 job could become obsolete by 2034, largely driven by the ongoing transformation in how we work. The acceleration of remote work, advancements in automation, blurring geographies, seeking skills vs degrees, and the rise of the gig economy are already challenging the traditional workday structure. In this evolving situation, work is likely to become more fluid and project-based, with a focus on results rather than hours logged. We may see a model where employees have the freedom to choose their work, working hours, and locations, thereby increasing their productivity and work-life balance. Individuals are likely to quickly shift between being an employee, freelancer or an entrepreneur.   

However, this shift would also require substantial changes in labor policies, employee benefits, and management practices. Companies will need to rethink how they hire, measure performance, or compensate people. Traditional models of health insurance and retirement plans will have to be redefined. The challenge will be to balance the benefits of this new work structure with the potential risks of increased worker isolation and burnout – a significant concern for the individual, the organization, and society as a whole.

If you would like to discuss any of these topics in greater detail, you can get in touch directly through our website, or book in a private and confidential one-hour consultation with one of our team members through our OrgShakers CL!CK service.

The benefits that a company offers to their prospective employees play a huge role in attracting and retaining talent. But as we know, different generations are drawn to different types of benefits, and as Gen Z enter into the workforce in full force, we are starting to see the emergence of new, innovative benefits being offered in order to attract this fresh new talent.

The latest new benefit? Gushcloud International – an IP management and licensing company – have recently started offering their employees ‘Tinder Leave’. The company has partnered with well-known dating app Tinder to offer their employees sponsored Tinder subscriptions and an additional paid day of leave for their staff to actively go on dates and seek out new connections in the hopes of improving their wellbeing outside of work.

Dating apps have become a very popular tool for fostering romantic relationships, especially amongst the younger generations. And there is a growing body of research to suggest that employees who are in happy, healthy relationships outside of work tend to be better, more productive workers. One study even found that married men were less likely to report workplace burnout and, as their marital satisfaction increased, burnout likelihood decreased.

From this perspective, companies that consider offering Tinder Leave could be paving the way for employee satisfaction to increase as their personal lives become socially and romantically nourished.

So, is Tinder Leave something that more companies should consider?

There are a lot of interesting benefits that could come from offering this type of perk to employees. For one thing, it’s an innovative way of highlighting a company’s care and commitment to social wellbeing. It also signifies that a business values work-life balance, through actively encouraging employees to take the time to build these connections.

However, there are some potential drawbacks that employers will need to consider, too. For instance, offering Tinder subscriptions could actually prove to be a distraction at work, as employees may be more tempted to be checking their phone and swiping through potential matches. So, when looking at this as a potential offering to employees, it’s important for employers to consider all the factors.

If you would like to discuss how we can help you design and implement innovative wellbeing strategies to improve work-life balance, please swipe right to get in touch with us today.

chevron-downchevron-down-circle linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram