Trauma-Informed or Trauma-Avoidant? Rethinking Safe Workplaces

‘Safe workplaces’ is a phrase that evokes the image of well-lit offices, inclusive signage, ergonomic seating, and perhaps a weekly wellness initiative. But beneath the polished exterior, the question of what ‘safe’ really means is becoming increasingly urgent.

Does safety mean physical security? Does it mean freedom from conflict? Or does it mean something deeper…a place where people can bring their full selves – including their pain, their fears, and their histories – without fear of punishment or erasure?

It can be worth employers asking themselves whether some of their ‘safe spaces’ are actually too safe. Not in the sense of being overly protective, but in being overly cautious to the point that real stories of trauma, burnout, and exclusion are never truly heard. In many cases, efforts to be trauma-informed can unintentionally morph into trauma-avoidance, and that silence can come at a cost.

Research shows that over 70% of employees remain silent in the workplace due to fear of negative consequences, even when they perceive their organization as psychologically safe. In the UK alone, more than 7.5 million workers (roughly 22%) struggle with mental health concerns but do not feel comfortable discussing these challenges with their employer. If we zoom out to get a global idea, you will find that anxiety and depression contribute to the loss of an estimated 12 billion workdays every year. These statistics aren’t just a sobering reality check, they are an invitation to rethink what workplace safety could actually mean.

Rather than viewing this as a failure, employers should see it as an opportunity. Every moment of silence is a missed connection, but also a space they can fill with empathy, trust, and change. A truly trauma-informed workplace doesn’t smooth over discomfort. Instead, it creates the conditions in which discomfort can be expressed and met with care (that doesn’t mean turning every meeting into a therapy session, but it does mean making room for honesty!).

Creating this kind of culture begins with simple but powerful shifts. Leaders who are willing to show vulnerability by acknowledging stress and admitting mistakes help to normalize emotional expression. When emotional honesty becomes a shared value rather than a risk, psychological safety grows.

And this isn’t just good for morale, it’s good for performance, too. Studies have shown that teams with high psychological safety are 50% more innovative, experience 25% less burnout, and have 40% lower employee turnover. In other words, when people feel safe to be real, they do better work.

Another key part of building a trauma-informed culture is equipping managers – not to act as therapists, but to act as empathetic witnesses. Unfortunately, despite 76% of managers feeling that their staff’s wellbeing was their concern, only 22% has ever had any form of mental health training. But this training doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Organizations can empower managers with simple tools like active listening techniques, a basic understanding of trauma responses, and permission to hold space without having all the answers.

These efforts can be supported by embedding micro-moments of safety throughout the organization. These don’t have to be big or flashy; a five-minute check-in at the start of a meeting, a culture of peer-to-peer appreciation, or an internal newsletter featuring real employee stories can quietly shift norms over time. After all, the goal is not perfection – it’s connection.

At its heart, a trauma-informed workplace is not about eliminating difficulty. It’s about responding to it with courage, compassion, and a willingness to grow. The most powerful kind of safety isn’t about avoiding pain, but instead making sure no one has to face it alone.

If you would like to discuss how we can help ensure that your workplace is trauma-informed and safe for all employees psychologically, please get in touch with us today!